Nama/NIM : Ahmad Shofa Al Amin/ 1902016132
Kelas: HKI D3
Makul : Hukum Perdata Islam Indonesia
Tugas Review Jurnal “State Marriage and Civil Marriage: The Role of State Policy on Interreligious Marriage in Central Java”
Journal Purpose. aims to discuss
how the phenomenon of interfaith marriage in Central Java, especially in
Surakarta, Semarang and Jepara occurs.
Research Subject. The subjects of
this research are Stakeholders, Demographic Officials, and Religious Leaders.
Journal Methods. The research
method used is a positivist approach, which seeks to reveal the truth of the
existing reality and how the phenomenon of interfaith marriage in Indonesia
occurs, especially in Central Java.
Research Result.
A. Concepts on Legal Policy and Legal Justice
The knowledge and
interests of each maker of law enforcement and its enforcer determine the birth
of a law, though in the ideal level , it should aim to uphold public
justice. In this sense, law enforcement in Indonesia also should normatively
have the authority to determine law using the sense of justice.
B. The Rights of Civil
Society
The Constitution of 1945
section 28B mentions the rights of citizens to establish a family and Law No.
39 of 1999 on Human Rights article 10 paragraph (1). Human rights in society
and nation includes: freedom of religion, of education and teaching, of thought
both orally and writing, of having a house or place of residence, of
association and assembly, the rights on protection and legal equality, equality
of constitutional rights, protection of self and property , individual freedom
which the state cannot contested it, and rights to have equal position in the
government. To conclude, it appears that the right for marriage is fundamental
for citizens as it is a part of civil rights that the state is supposed to
guarantee it.
C. The Regulation on
Interreligious Marriage in Indonesia
The concept of mixed
marriage contained in the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 has different coverage
with Staatsblad 1898 No. 158. Article 64 of Marriage Law states that "what
is meant by a mixed marriage in the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage
between two people in Indonesia which are subjected to different laws because
of different nationalities in which one of the parties has Indonesian nationality".
The regulations of interreligious marriage are separated from normative
validity on the Marriage Law with administrative rules in the law No. 23 of
2006 on the demographic administration and this makes interreligious marriage
often referred to as a civil marriage.
D. Administration System and
Its Mechanism towards Interreligious Marriage in Indonesia
Law Number 23 of 2006
concerning Population Administration describes the order of important community
events, one of which is the marriage event mentioned in Articles 8 and 9 in
addition to Articles 34 and 35 which clarify the provisions for registration of
marriage. it is clear that critical incidents including spouse marriages
outside the Muslim community are recorded at the Population and Civil Registry
Service as described in Article 8 of Law Number 23 of 2006. However, the
explanation of Article 9 paragraph (1) letter b states that the recording is
carried out after the civil record has received the Court's decision which
shows that the person concerned has received the District Court's decision.
E. The
Policies of Implementing Interreligious Marriage
The policy makers should have broader understanding about
the regulations of interreligious marriage so that they can provide a fiar
solution to the whole community including couples who want to perfrom
interreligious marriage. In addition, laws on marriage should not contradict
each other and have a chance to create different understanding starting from
the rules in pancasila as the ideology the constitution of 1945, the marriage
law No. 1 of 1974 the demographic administration law No. 23 of 2006 and others.
F. Interreligious
Marriage Between State Policy and Rights of Civil Society
The different policy overshadowed by different understanding on the provision of interreligious marriage at the state court and the office of civil registry in Semarang, Jepara and Surakarta indicates the existence of different interpretation among the law enforcers of the relevant regulation Indonesia. in fact, the policy makers and law enforcers should firstly understand the legal basis of pancasila and the provision in article 29 paragraph (2) of the constitutional of 1945 which states “the state guarantees the freedom of every citizen to profess their own religion” law No. 39 of 1999 on human rights (HAM) article 10 paragraph (1) which explains “every person has the right to build a family and continue their descendant through legitimate marriage and free waill” as well as related article on interreligious marriage which are not esplicitly described in marriage law No. 1 of 1974.
Source: http://ejournal.iainmadura.ac.id/index.php/alihkam/article/view/2689/1866
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar