Nama :
M. Irham maulana
NIM :
1902016137
Kelas :
HKID3
Matkul :
HUKUM PERDATA ISLAM INDONESIA
Tugas UAS Review Jurnal “State Marriage and Civil Marriage: The Role of State
Policy on Interreligious Marriage in Central Java”
Mahfud futher said that policy law is also a legal direction needed by
the state to enforce it to achieve its goals by making new laws or replacing
old nes.
Foucault also explains that the legal and
judicial systems are areas that are definitely associated with domination and
power through conquest. According to him, law should not be demonstrated with
established legitimacy, when in fact it is always a process of conquest.
However Rawls said that a just law must be
based on justice and a sense of justice for the public, while obeying the law
determines the extent to which laws, institutions and policies are fair. Not
only normative, justice is also at the procedural level of justice.
Marriage in Indonesia before the birth of the Marriage Law Number 1 of
1974 is regulated in several laws, namely religious law, customary law and
Western law. During the reign of the Netherlands, marriages were arranged in
several rules according to the following groupings. First, Europeans follow the
Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek / BW). Second, Chinese in general also
participate in BW with the exception of Civil Registration and pre-marriage
events. Third, Arabs and Easterners outside China follow their own customary
laws. Fourth, Indonesian indigenous peoples follow customary law in which
Christians follow the Christian, Javanese, Minahasa and Ambon Marriage Deed
(Ordinance Huwelijk Christen Indonesiers Java, Minahasa an Amboina / HOCI)
based on Staatsblad No. 74 in 1933. Fifth, non-people from the previous class /
group follow the rules of mixed marriage.
Prior to the provision
of marriage in the Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974, interfaith marriages had
legal legitimacy based on Staatsblad 1898 no. 158. In the Marriage Law, it is
clear that there are no provisions regarding interfaith
marriage because the law itself only recognizes and only states the validity of
interfaith marriages as referred to in Article 2 paragraph (1).
The state appears to
allow interfaith marriages because they must not be legally registered.
Unfortunately, interfaith marriage is only recognized as an administrative
marriage registered with the Population and Civil Registry Office instead of a
marriage that is legalized as a legally valid marriage even though some
religious understandings allow this type of marriage.
The policy for organizing interfaith marriages is very much influenced
by how and to what extent stakeholders understand or consider the provisions
regarding interfaith marriage. In this view, Mahfudh argues that state policy
does affect the color of the existing law. Likewise, Birkland explained that
among its characteristics, policies are made based on the public interest.
There are several procedures that must be
done to be able to register the marriage. Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1
of 1974 concerning Marriage is indeed an assistance that "Marriage is
legal, carried out according to the law of each religion and belief".
Meanwhile, Article 8 letter f of the Marriage Law states that marriage is prohibited
if religious regulations are prohibited as well as other applicable
regulations.
If the validity of the marriage can be
ascertained, then the next mandate of the Marriage Law must be carried out,
namely the registration of marriage.
According to Article 35 of the Adminduk Law,
marriages determined by the court must be reported. Described in the
elucidation of Article 35 letter a of the Adminduk Law, a marriage determined
by the court is a marriage between people of different religions.
The reporting procedure is regulated in
Article 34 of the Adminduk Law. Reporting must be made no later than sixty days
from the date of marriage. Then, based on this report, the civil registration
official recorded it in the Marriage Certificate Register and issued a Marriage
Certificate. Meanwhile, residents who are Muslim reported it to the religious
affairs office (KUA).
This article stipulates that only interfaith
marriages that can be registered at the civil registry office are non-Muslim.
However, it is not automatic that interfaith marriages involving Muslim
residents can be registered at the KUA. Because, this is regulated in Article 2
paragraph (1) Government Regulation no. 9 of 1975 concerning the Implementation
of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage.
PP No. 9 of 1975 states explicitly that
marriages that can be registered at the KUA are those that are carried out in
Islam. This means that interfaith marriages, if carried out by court order, are
registered at the civil registry office.
marriage registration is absolutely
essential. This is because there are many consequences if this obligation is
not fulfilled. He revealed that unregistered marriages can have an impact on
the status of children and also involve inheritance issues.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar